Skip to subscribe

Your reading, back to you as a five-minute morning letter.

Share a post from anywhere. It disappears into a queue. The next morning: one well-edited letter of what you chose, with links straight to the originals. No feed, no algorithm.

for people who live in Substack

Share it.

From Substack, Safari, or anything with a share sheet. One tap. The post goes into your queue and out of your way.

Forget it.

No feed to tend. The letter is written while you sleep: thesis, the points that matter, whether it's worth the morning.

Read it.

One short letter. Must-reads marked in red pen. Every entry opens the original — on Substack, if that's where you read.

Thursday, August 13

Two of today's saves circle the same anxiety from opposite ends: Sloan wants you to reject the feed, while Kim's piece on metrics is really about the feed's business logic seen from the inside. The semicolon essay is a palate cleanser. The grid piece is subscriber-only, opening it on Substack.

The End of the Feed

Algorithmic feeds have quietly become the default reading surface, and that default is worth actively rejecting.

  • Feeds optimize for engagement, not comprehension. The two diverge more than we admit.
  • Chronological and curated reading rebuilds a sense of authorship over your own attention.
  • The cost of leaving the feed is loneliness; the payoff is a smaller, chosen information diet.

"You are not behind. There is no line. The feed invented the line so you would keep running."

Why Your Startup's Metrics Are Lying to You

Vanity metrics survive because they're easy to move; the metrics that matter are the ones nobody wants to own.

  • Activation, not signups, is the number that predicts retention, and it's the hardest to game.
  • A metric with no owner is a metric that lies by omission.
  • Instrument the funnel step you're most afraid to look at first.

Teams that report weekly on activation churn 40% less in year one.

A Short History of the Semicolon

The semicolon's decline tracks a broader shift away from tolerating ambiguity in prose.

  • Once a mark of sophistication, it's now read as fussy or uncertain.
  • Its job, joining two thoughts that resist being separated, has no clean replacement.
  • The trend mirrors how we increasingly want writing to be skimmable, not savored.

Inside the Quiet Rewrite of the Power Grid

Subscriber-only, opens the full post on Substack.

until tomorrow